Write a commentSasha Latypova, who worked in the pharmaceutical and medical device industry, builds the case that vaccines and other toxic injections are the #1 driver of cancer in the majority of cancers. She created a chart that reaches back 175 years and explores the history of cancer that was almost non-existent before vaccines.
In this episode of the True Health Report, Dr. Andy Kaufman was joined by Sasha Latypova to disprove cancer as a random case of “bad luck,” and explore the missing pieces of the cancer puzzle mainstream science doesn’t want you to know about. You’ll discover:
- Why smoking cigarettes might not be the cause of cancer at all
- The shift in society that really led to the onset of cancer (and why so few talk about it)
- The hidden cause of food allergies and why they have become so widespread
- How the Nocebo effect plays a much larger role in cancer than we think
- Why we’re constantly being conditioned to fear cancer (and why the risk is not what we’re made to believe)
Click on the image for the video
Chapters:
00:00:00 – How Sasha became a truth-speaker
00:08:53 – The virus cancer program (a money-making machine that failed to take flight) 00:14:30 – Smoking doesn’t cause cancer?
00:17:57 – Your genes aren’t to blame either
00:19:42 – Actuarial reports vs the “science”
00:32:09 – When cancer was non-existent
00:37:05 – The real cause of cancer?
00:50:24 – Why you’re really allergic to food
00:55:36 – How harmful are vaccines really?
01:04:00 – More evidence
01:07:23 – Learn more about Sasha
From Sasha Latypova’s Substack Account:
175+ Years of Cancer: The Big Picture the Establishment Doesn’t Want You to See.
Dear Readers,
I am going to publish series of articles with in depth research about vaccinations (more generally, injections of various “biologics”) as the primary and the most important driver of cancer burden on society.
Join the Coalition! Become an affiliate member today! Click Here!
Let’s start with the premise that the purpose of a system is what it does. This article is a review of what the system of modern science, medicine and public health has done “fighting cancer” over the past 175+ years of the so-called “scientific medical progress”. We shall quickly realize the system wasn’t so much fighting cancer, but rather creating MORE cancer as a vast business opportunity on which to feed itself.
In this post I am going to quote a very extensive (800+ pages) actuarial report, widely considered the single most influential cancer text published in the United States in the early twentieth century, the Hoffman Prudential Report from 1915. Data like these are gold, and I suspect are being scrubbed off the internet as we speak. Those who do not learn from history are bound to repeat it. Those who do not learn from the history of medicine are bound to experience premature death from cancer or some other “ancient and baffling scrouge of humanity” that turns out to be very recent and iatrogenic, i.e., induced by the establishment medicine in the last century or so in the first place.
The Hoffman Prudential report makes an unimpeachable case that the steadily increasing rates of cancer in the US and many other countries are “real” and cannot be explained away by the commonly used socioeconomic or demographic adjustments. The authors clearly demonstrated that this increase was not due to aging population, not because of improved diagnostics, not attributed to occupational hazards and exposure to toxic materials, not because of “racial disparities” (or lack thereof, as the system will use in whichever version is more convenient), and not because of lacking access to care, but rather in strong correlation to its roll-out. Curiously, while discussing an exhaustive list of demographic variables, ethnic/racial differences, and numerous theories of cancer causation, the Hoffman Report does not mention the word “vaccine” even once. This curious omission, and sticking to “anything but vaccines” narrative speaks louder than anything else.
I will address the various theories of cancer causation in future articles, this one is already long. You know my working theory – “it’s the vaccines, stupid! (ITVS!)”
This post is not about me saying ITVS! again, but for you to examine the historic data and see for yourself that none of the commonly attributed environmental or demographic causes can explain the terrifying onslaught of cancer on society during the past century and a half. I am currently compiling information on vaccination policies and coverage in 1800-early 1900s and, unlike what you may think (i.e. “barely anyone was vaccinated before 1960s”), universal vaccination and high coverage was already wide spread in the Western world by late 1800s. Keep that in mind while reading this post.
To assess the historical rates of cancer per 100K population, first, let’s look at the past 50 years. Here are the cancer trends in the United States, post 1975, using data from the CDC Seer database:
From this graph, it is evident that since 1975, cancer is predominantly male, and predominantly black male. The major increase in the cancers in men of both races which peaked in the 1990s is commonly attributed to smoking. The “smoking” bump is entirely driven by cancers in men, while women seem largely unaffected. This is strange, since there was a fairly large % of smokers among women around the same time, but no “bump” appears in the female charts. More about that issue in future articles. Also note a very strange clear racial difference between black and white men, and practically no difference between black and white women, albeit, the rates in white women appear slightly worse. These differences are bizarre! How come, an allegedly “ancient scrouge” of humanity is so curiously selective and capricious by gender and race?
These curiosities aside, the data since 1975 gives a perception that cancer has always been a major malady occurring at a pretty constant rate, and that smoking is a bad, risky behavior, which makes one’s chances of getting cancer substantially worse. While smoking is consistently claimed a major risk factor for cancer, the establishment is in no hurry to explain a rather “baffling” long term trends of consistent increase in cancers at younger and younger age groups and in children, who do not smoke, nor are exposed to smoke.
Let’s look at the older cancer statistics, prior to 1975. The Hoffman report provides many datasets for U.S., Europe and some states separately. I used Massachusetts data as it is one of the first settled and populous states with major obsessions with “public health”, “modern medicine” and (purely coincidentally!) witchcraft, too. Combining Mass data before 1920 with CDC data after 1975, gives this jaw dropping picture:
Stunning, isn’t it?
After compiling this information, there is very little doubt in my mind that cancer is not a naturally occurring human illness. It is a manufactured, induced illness, and its weaponization was the military-state goal before more elaborate tales of the invisible weaponized flying viruses were even invented!
1915 Mortality, Statistics, and the Rise of Cancer
Frederick L. Hoffman, statistician at the Prudential Insurance Company of Newark, published The Mortality from Cancer Throughout the World in 1915, a 826-page volume drawing on death-registration data from more than thirty countries. Hoffman concluded that cancer mortality in the registration areas of the United States and Western Europe had been rising at roughly 1%-2% per annum for at least two decades and that the rise could not be explained away by improvements in diagnosis, or any typical demographic or socioeconomic adjustments.
Hoffman’s findings rested on data that the U.S. federal government had only recently begun to collect. The Bureau of the Census had organized the original Death Registration Area in 1900, comprising the New England states, New York, New Jersey, Indiana, Michigan, and the District of Columbia—roughly 40 per cent of the U.S. population. Coverage expanded steadily and full national coverage was achieved only in 1933. The annual Mortality Statistics volumes published by the Bureau of the Census from 1900 onward provided, for the first time, a serial federal record of cancer deaths in the United States by age, sex, and state.
Let’s remind ourselves, that the “modern” cancer data published by CDC since 1975 shows prevalence of the disease as follows: 1) black men; 2) white men; 3) white women; 4) black women. Cancer rates get progressively higher in younger population as time goes on.
Here is where cancer statistics get rather curious, indeed: