Write a comment

From globalresearch.ca
by Mark Steele

Fifth Generation (5G) Directed Energy Radiation Emissions In the Context of Contaminated Nanometal Covid-19 Vaccines with Graphite Ferrous Oxide Antennas

Excerpt:

Conclusion

To quote Martin L Pall, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Biochemistry and Medical Sciences at Washington State University, “Putting tens of millions of 5G antennas, without a single biological test of safety, has to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world”. Professor Pall is wrong, however: it is not a stupid idea but a heinous crime if one understands the motive behind this deployment. 5G is a compartmentalized weapons deployment masquerading as a benign technological advance for enhanced communications and faster downloads.

I have acted as a witness and provided statements in several court cases, exposing the lack of any credible evidence that the 5G light-emitting diode (LED) network and planned neural connection to the 5G grid are safe.

This includes nano metamaterial technologies that are contaminating vaccinations, that are not legal or lawful, and that breach a number of international and domestic laws.

Judge Nolan at Newcastle Crown Court stated that “The 5G risk must be debated” and that “This is a democracy and the public have a right to know”.

The evidence I presented to the court defeated the attempt by the local authorities and actors in the British establishment to silence me from providing the published scientific evidence on the risks posed to the public and environment from the 5G urban radar network and its ultimate purpose.

The failed court action taken by the local authority created a publicity storm that helped to highlight the actual risks from the 5G deployment across the world, as well as the total lack of care taken by regulators allowing this 5G deployment.

Write a comment

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The right of every American to question and criticize their government is enshrined in the Bill of Rights in the First Amendment. Prohibiting dissenting views on any government institution or practice is strictly unconstitutional.

However, for the past few years many people have voiced concern about Big Tech platforms censoring dissenting views against the government, and the most common argument used by Big Tech is that they are simply a private platform that allows people to voice their views, and that the First Amendment does not apply to private corporations.

But now emails between the CDC and Google, Facebook, and Twitter have surfaced that suggest that the U.S. Government is, indeed, censoring dissenting views by influencing these Big Tech platforms, specifically in regards to the COVID-19 vaccines.

Write a comment

A must hear. The father who resides in NZ, and whose 7 year old was taken by his mother in New York to receive the experimental covid injection, phones the pharmacist responsible after his son develops post-jab myocarditis. He asks why they are not warning people when they know of this risk to children (who are not even at risk of covid, he adds). Shockingly, the pharmacist admits it is because they are afraid the parents will not get their children jabbed if they do!

A must share if you know parents who are unsure, should they or shouldn't they get their children jabbed. TWNZ

EXCERPT: "Possible death within five years. 20% of people with myocarditis die! It is a permanent, damaged heart. It is not temporary! He's facing a heart transplant because of you! Because you didn't want to scare her! You know no kids have died from COVID, not a single healthy kid, and you're giving this stuff out, and you're not warning people? What is wrong with you?"

CV Injection Deaths Injuries 08 August 2022 Hits: 2288

Read more …

Write a comment

From NZ Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS)

Predictable and tragic as it is, official German government data indicates serious injury in 1:5000 doses from the novel experimental synthetic gene injection. And it becomes increasingly clear that a novel experimental injection of this nature would never have made out it out of the blocks had it been properly and exhaustively tested over even a reasonable modicum of time beyond the 2 months data cut-off of the initial Pfizer trial.

Withdrawal long ago on grounds of unsafe and ineffective, as indeed it should have been after the publication of the Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) received through 28-FEB-2021 with its Appendix of 9 pages and over 1000 clinical conditions described as List of Adverse Events of Special Interest, a ‘safety signal’ by the reckoning of the many affected.

The big thing appearing here is that it is more than likely that the German data for injection injury value is under-reported by a factor of at least x10 ~ see the below about Passive Reporting Systems.

Try as it may, the cyclopian New Zealand media and government are not stifling this story even with the banal and routine censorship of any counter-narrative, namely, their mis/dis/mal information crusade to suppress any disagreement with injection narrative.

READ AT THE LINK

https://nzdsos.com/2022/08/02/german-government-bows-to-injection-injuries/

Image by Jörn Heller from Pixabay

Write a comment

From the Hatchard Report

EXCERPT: "Official numbers from the UK Health Security Agency ... triple vaccinated who are dead within 28 days: 1,557 ... everybody else dead within 28 days, 577... so the triple vaccinated are dying within 28 days at a rate approximately three times higher than the rest of the population" GBNEWS.UK

"People not fully vaccinated against Covid-19, that is they've had less than two doses, are six times more likely to die if they catch Covid-19 compared with someone who has had at least one booster dose" Ashley Bloomfield

Write a comment

From clarkcountytoday.com
via markcrispinmiller.com

A study based on weekly government data in New Zealand – one of the world’s most vaccinated nations – found that the age groups most likely to have had COVID booster shots had up to 10% more excess deaths.

Excess mortality is the number of deaths from all causes above what would be typically expected in one year.

Authored by John Gibson, an economics professor at the University of Waikato in Hamilton, New Zealand, the study found there were 16 excess deaths per 100,000 booster doses in the country, amounting to more than 400 excess deaths, reported the website The Expose.

Gibson said that if extrapolated, it amounted to 300,000 excess deaths worldwide.

Write a comment

From hatchardreport.com

Acute presentations at ED [NZ] are increasing, but what are they ill with? We aren’t being told and may never be if our health czars are allowed to continue to deny access to information...

Excess all-cause mortality in New Zealand is running at record levels. About 100 people are dying each day in New Zealand (pop. 5 million).

A few times during the last couple of months, we have asked a key question: what are people dying of?

Ministry of Health data records that about 7 people are dying each day with Covid, but only about a maximum of 3 of these per day because of Covid. That is just 3% of deaths.

Occupancy of ICU beds with Covid hovers around 3-5%. Therefore it is not Covid that is overwhelming our hospitals, so what is?

Write a comment

From The Forum, a very honest interview by Paul Brennan with a former Qantas Captain. Graham Hood describes the journey that led up to his resigning from his job and career ultimately. Since then he has spoken out about the CV jab mandates ... and much more ... TWNZ

 

“I consider myself fairly much asleep until about 2019. I started to wake up to a lot of things that were going on. I’ve never dabbled in anything too underground media wise. I’ve tried to form my opinions in the mainstream which I see now as being foolish” – Graham Hood, Former QANTAS Captain

 

Listen at the link below:

https://theplatform.kiwi/podcasts